Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On the other hand, maybe for VHT we want to completely change channel > specifications? Maybe it would be better to allow specifying the > *global* center frequency of the entire channel, and the width, and the > control channel offset instead of encoding everything into the single > channel type value? I don't know. What about the future? Will we see 320 MHz wide channels in 2020? :) After following the discussion about this I'm starting to think that what you propose above makes our life easier in the long run. I just don't trust that using a single channel type value is scalable in the long run. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
