On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:50:13AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On the other hand, maybe for VHT we want to completely change channel > > specifications? Maybe it would be better to allow specifying the > > *global* center frequency of the entire channel, and the width, and the > > control channel offset instead of encoding everything into the single > > channel type value? I don't know. > > What about the future? Will we see 320 MHz wide channels in 2020? :) Not in 2016 ? > After following the discussion about this I'm starting to think that > what you propose above makes our life easier in the long run. I just > don't trust that using a single channel type value is scalable in the > long run. Yeh, I think our channel description in code should reflect to what we have in new spec. That should fit well for legacy channels as well. Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
