On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 02:25:48PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2012/8/10 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > On 08/10/2012 11:32 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> 2012/8/10 Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >>> On 08/09/2012 10:38 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >>>> This allows drivers to access flash conditionally and stop crashing some > >>>> devices. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> John: I suggest taking it for wirelesss, AKA fix > >>> > >>> Maybe you could mentioned devices and/or drivers crashes without this patch? > >> > >> Yes, sure! The problematic one for me is arch/mips/bcm47xx/nvram.c. > >> Right now it assumes every BCMA board has pflash. I'll submit fix for > >> mips tree when this patch hits it. > > > > Letting this patches get merged into the wireless tree and an other > > patches which depends on this one into the mips tree will cause > > problems, because the wireless tree only gets merged into the mips tree > > indirectly round about the rc1 release in form of the rc1 release done > > by Linus. > > > > The patch to arch/mips/bcm47xx/nvram.c will depend on this one and you > > should submit them to the same tree. > > I'm planning to wait until rc2 (or rc3 if needed). I know the dependency :) Which rc2? Because Ralf probably won't have it in his tree until the 3.7-rc1 timeframe... -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
