2012/8/10 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 08/10/2012 11:32 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> 2012/8/10 Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> On 08/09/2012 10:38 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>>> This allows drivers to access flash conditionally and stop crashing some >>>> devices. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> John: I suggest taking it for wirelesss, AKA fix >>> >>> Maybe you could mentioned devices and/or drivers crashes without this patch? >> >> Yes, sure! The problematic one for me is arch/mips/bcm47xx/nvram.c. >> Right now it assumes every BCMA board has pflash. I'll submit fix for >> mips tree when this patch hits it. > > Letting this patches get merged into the wireless tree and an other > patches which depends on this one into the mips tree will cause > problems, because the wireless tree only gets merged into the mips tree > indirectly round about the rc1 release in form of the rc1 release done > by Linus. > > The patch to arch/mips/bcm47xx/nvram.c will depend on this one and you > should submit them to the same tree. I'm planning to wait until rc2 (or rc3 if needed). I know the dependency :) -- Rafał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
