On 08/10/2012 11:32 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2012/8/10 Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 08/09/2012 10:38 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> This allows drivers to access flash conditionally and stop crashing some >>> devices. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> John: I suggest taking it for wirelesss, AKA fix >> >> Maybe you could mentioned devices and/or drivers crashes without this patch? > > Yes, sure! The problematic one for me is arch/mips/bcm47xx/nvram.c. > Right now it assumes every BCMA board has pflash. I'll submit fix for > mips tree when this patch hits it. Letting this patches get merged into the wireless tree and an other patches which depends on this one into the mips tree will cause problems, because the wireless tree only gets merged into the mips tree indirectly round about the rc1 release in form of the rc1 release done by Linus. The patch to arch/mips/bcm47xx/nvram.c will depend on this one and you should submit them to the same tree. Hauke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
