On 06/15/2012 06:53 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > So how about CONFIG_CFG80211_CERTIFICATION_ONUS which can be defined > as an option for features / options whereby the onus for regulatory > certification is being accepted by the option enabler? Pretty simple > and to the point, and would allow for research code but also code > whereby a bit more work is required on the enabler like DFS > certification. English is not my native language so I had to look up the meaning of the word 'onus'. I guess I am fine with it. Apart from the naming I addressed that if would be better to have it device on CONFIG_WLAN instead of CFG80211 as it will be used to enable 802.11 device driver features. Any thoughts on that? Gr. AvS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
