On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 17:40 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > > I still don't see the need. What would you put under it in > > brcm[sf]mac? I certainly wouldn't see any reason to put anything > > under it in our driver since it's much simpler to . > > Looks like something is missing here? Sorry, yeah, Iwas going to say it's simpler to put something under the driver's Kconfig. > > Also, the argument about distros doesn't really work that way, if > > there are users interested in something then the distros will > > certainly enable this (CFG80211_EXPERT) option to get something > > hidden behind it. > > I would compare this with NL80211_TESTMODE, we don't want distributions > to enable that either. Of course nothing prevents distros to enable > CFG80211_EXPERT but we need to be active to make sure it's not enabled > (ie. check the distro configs and file bugs etc). Right, but that's actually a feature. I see little value in a pretty much meaningless "EXPERT wireless" Kconfig symbol that only groups others. If, as Arend suggested, it actually has some meaning, then it may make more sense. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
