On 06/11/2012 09:59 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 06/10/2012 03:10 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> On 06/07/2012 09:21 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> I dived into this and basically there is no correlation to the phy type.
>>> There are chips with same 80211 core rev and different phy type as there
>>> are chips with different 80211 core rev and the same phy type.
>>>
>>> Gr. AvS
>>
>> Hi Arend,
>>
>> Ok, then I will leave it based on the core rev like it is now. Are the
>> values I added there for core rev 17 and 28 correct? They are just
>> copied from the other phy-n device which has the same values set after
>> powering up and before they are explicitly set. The core rev 17 device
>> is working for me, but the core rev 28 is not, but I do not know why. I
>> was unable to find these values in b43 or the spec b43 is based on.
>>
>> Hauke
>>
>
> Dug up the values and for corerev 17 they are fine, but corerev 28 has
> different values:
>
> { 9, 58, 22, 14, 14, 5 }, /* corerev 28 */
>
> Gr. AvS
>
Thanks for the values, I will change them.
Hauke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
