On Tuesday 05 June 2012 03:03 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
Hi Mohammed,
static const struct ieee80211_iface_limit a[] = {
{ .max = 2, .types = BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) },
};
static const struct ieee80211_iface_limit b[] = {
{ .max = 2, .types = BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT) },
};
static const struct ieee80211_iface_combination if_comb[] = {
{.limits = a,
.n_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(a),
.max_interfaces = 2,
.num_different_channels = 1,
},
{.limits = b,
.n_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(b),
.max_interfaces = 2,
.num_different_channels = 1,
},
};
i could not add mesh interface if a managed interface is already there
and vice versa. if this is the expected behavior, then fine.
No, that's not expected! Another bug!
Actually, I'm sorry -- clearly I wasn't paying attention before -- it is
expected. The above means you can add two managed or two mesh interface,
but no combinations of them. Basically, the things in if_comb are XOR,
and the things inside each limit are AND.
thanks, then the updated http://p.sipsolutions.net/fedf39a8d08b28b7.txt
seems to solve the issue.
--
thanks,
shafi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html