Hi Mohammed,
> >> static const struct ieee80211_iface_limit a[] = {
> >> { .max = 2, .types = BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) },
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct ieee80211_iface_limit b[] = {
> >> { .max = 2, .types = BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT) },
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const struct ieee80211_iface_combination if_comb[] = {
> >> {.limits = a,
> >> .n_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(a),
> >> .max_interfaces = 2,
> >> .num_different_channels = 1,
> >> },
> >> {.limits = b,
> >> .n_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(b),
> >> .max_interfaces = 2,
> >> .num_different_channels = 1,
> >> },
> >>
> >> };
> >>
> >> i could not add mesh interface if a managed interface is already there
> >> and vice versa. if this is the expected behavior, then fine.
> >
> > No, that's not expected! Another bug!
Actually, I'm sorry -- clearly I wasn't paying attention before -- it is
expected. The above means you can add two managed or two mesh interface,
but no combinations of them. Basically, the things in if_comb are XOR,
and the things inside each limit are AND.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
