Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Fix a WARNING in suspend/resume with IBSS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Johannes,


You could just remove the entire check since the interface combinations
you advertise don't allow it, I think? Or just fix those
combinations :-)

i did not check this before, thanks a lot for your inputs. will send a
proper v2 after checking this out.

If this is needed for stable, you might want to keep this patch&   send
another one to remove it.

thanks Johannes.
i was looking at how to fix this properly in iface combination
advertised to mac80211.  got few doubts regarding this

*if an interface type is not all advertised in the
ieee80211_iface_combination then it cannot it be co-existing with any
other interfaces ?
please let me know is there some other way do that.

if we advertise something like this

static const struct ieee80211_iface_limit if_limits[] = {
	{set1
      	.... },
	{set 2
	.... },
};

then interface types in set1 and set2 co-exist as per the logic in
cfg80211_can_change_interface. is there already a way we can make
set1 and set2 interface types mutually exclusive ? thanks!

The sets are mutually exclusive, and there are implied sets of each
interface with a max number of 1. So for example, in iwlwifi we don't
advertise IBSS in the combinations at all, because it's not compatible
with anything. In your case, I think the same applies, since you said

         if the first interface is ADHOC we cannot have any other
         interface. we cannot add an ADHOC interface if there is already
         an interface is present

Thus, if you leave IBSS out of the combinations you should get the
desired behaviour of not being able to combine IBSS with any other
types.


ath9k and also iwlwifi seems to have IBSS check not included in any of the interface combinations, but still i am able to IBSS interface atleast in ath9k with the checks removed in drv_add_interface.
it seems we are allowing any interface type to be added even if
its not added in the ieee80211_iface_combination structure.

i am sending an RFC to add this check in cfg80211 based on my understanding. please review my understanding and any corrections
needed. thanks for your thoughts!

--
thanks,
shafi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux