On 2012-06-02 8:14 PM, Guido Iribarren wrote: > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The sets are mutually exclusive, and there are implied sets of each >> interface with a max number of 1. So for example, in iwlwifi we don't >> advertise IBSS in the combinations at all, because it's not compatible >> with anything. In your case, I think the same applies, since you said >> >> if the first interface is ADHOC we cannot have any other >> interface. we cannot add an ADHOC interface if there is already >> an interface is present > > I've been following the thread and still can't get this confusion out > of my head: > i'm currently using kernel 3.3.2 (openwrt trunk r31439), with Atheros > AR9285 and i can succesfully combine IBSS interface with AP or STA > modes... > > # iw dev > phy#0 > Interface wlan0-1 > ifindex 11 > type AP > Interface wlan0-2 > ifindex 10 > type IBSS > Interface wlan0 > ifindex 9 > type AP > > So, does this patch mean this functionality will be lost in future > versions of ath9k? > or maybe it is officially unsupported and openwrt has patches applied? > or, even worse, I completely misunderstood what you're talking about? > (in that case i'm sorry for the noise) It's officially unsupported, OpenWrt has patches to enable it. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
