Arik Nemtsov <arik@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> But this was a workaround for an IOP problem with certain APs, right? >> How is firmware going to be smart in that case? >> >> It would help to see what you are exactly planning to do on wl12xx with >> this interface. Currently I'm just guessing what your plans really are. > > The plan is to enable only VO as U-APSD (as I wrote in a previous > email). You mean you will hardcode it in wl12xx and with all APs only VO has U-APSD enabled? > We've had problems with some APs (can't remember the models) that > assume non-VO ACs always use legacy PS. This would lead to problems - > our driver would never wake up. In that sense the problem is general. Yeah, that looks like a general problem but of course it's difficult to make any conclusions with this little data. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
