2012/5/24 Arik Nemtsov <arik@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> But this was a workaround for an IOP problem with certain APs, right? >> How is firmware going to be smart in that case? >> >> It would help to see what you are exactly planning to do on wl12xx with >> this interface. Currently I'm just guessing what your plans really are. > > The plan is to enable only VO as U-APSD (as I wrote in a previous > email). We've had problems with some APs (can't remember the models) > that assume non-VO ACs always use legacy PS. This would lead to > problems - our driver would never wake up. In that sense the problem > is general. > > But in wl12xx the FW handles network PS on its own (PS-poll etc.), so > it may just be a bug with our FW. So hard-coding this into mac80211 > seems a bit of an overkill. > > Maybe you can offer a better solution? > I am not sure this is better. We do this litte bit different. So disable all ACs by default in mac80211. Next we are using wpa_supplicant: p2p_set client_apsd - and pass required params via nl80211 to mac80211. So, we could decide which ACs set. Reassoc from supplicat is required after that. BR Janusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
