From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:27:10 +0200 > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 10:59 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > >> OK, but fyi, there's a possible issue with !CONFIG_DEBUG >> builds because these patches converted some uses of >> if (net_ratelimit()) >> printk(KERN_DEBUG ... >> to >> net_dbg_ratelimited() >> >> These messages are no longer emitted when DEBUG isn't defined >> and not using dynamic_debug. I'm not sure that's a real >> problem, but it's a difference. >> >> I could produce a net_printk_ratelimited that would keep >> the original behavior if necessary. >> >> net_printk_ratelimited(KERN_DEBUG etc...) > > Btw, what would the difference be to just plain printk_ratelimited()? printk_ratelimited() drops a local ratelimit cookie into each call-site, whereas we have a global one for the networking which these new interfaces use. Joe explained this completely in his 0/2 patch posting. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
