From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 20:29:08 +0200 > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 14:24 -0400, David Miller wrote: > >> > But don't you have to do something in the sources to actually get >> > dynamic_debug enabled? I'm concerned this will make mac80211 debugging >> > inconsistent - the normal bits are just printk() still, and the >> > rate-limited bits need some special enabling? That seems odd. >> >> You can turn them all off or on with a simple flip of a boolean switch >> at run-time. Or, alternatively, you can turn them on or off in a >> finer grained manner with other run-time facilities. >> >> There should be a transition away from explicit KERN_DEBUG. > > I support that, but I think it's confusing to have things mixed. Also, > we seem to have printk_ratelimit(), so I'd prefer to have that used in > mac80211 instead until everything there moves over to newer facilities. No, you don't want that, it's different from the networking ratelimit mechanism. Joe explained this, and I just explaing it to you once again in another reply. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
