On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Goldenshtein, Victor <victorg@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm just trying to make sure that you're OK with a simple two-line iw >> patch being sufficient to start transmitting on radar channels ... >> >>> I think the driver should perform this simple "sanity" checks, >>> otherwise we"ll need to save different DFS states in the mac, not sure >>> that this is what we want. >> >> I disagree -- adding this in each driver, which will surely end up with >> slightly different semantics, seems like a recipe for disaster. >> > > Zefir Kurtisi and myself thought to rename the start_radar detection + > en_tx functions to something like > dfs_start_cac() and dfs_resume_cac(), these two will set/reset > WIPHY_FLAG_DFS_CAC_IN_PROGRESS flag, which should add some additional > protection. > Are you OK with this ? I'd be more comfortable with a timer for the CAC as well. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
