On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm just trying to make sure that you're OK with a simple two-line iw > patch being sufficient to start transmitting on radar channels ... > >> I think the driver should perform this simple "sanity" checks, >> otherwise we"ll need to save different DFS states in the mac, not sure >> that this is what we want. > > I disagree -- adding this in each driver, which will surely end up with > slightly different semantics, seems like a recipe for disaster. > Zefir Kurtisi and myself thought to rename the start_radar detection + en_tx functions to something like dfs_start_cac() and dfs_resume_cac(), these two will set/reset WIPHY_FLAG_DFS_CAC_IN_PROGRESS flag, which should add some additional protection. Are you OK with this ? -- Thanks, Victor. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
