On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 10:41 +0100, Helmut Schaa wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Would _is_frag() read nicer? The piece you're checking is a fragment I > >> think? > > > > Never mind ... the first fragment has is a fragment too and doesn't > > return true here. > > We could also call it ieee80211_is_first_frag and swap the logic? That seems like a good idea. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
