On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:02 +0200, Helmut Schaa wrote: > > Makes sense, but I wonder if we really should continue using > > radiotap :-) Maybe mgmt-tx in nl80211 would be appropriate. An nl80211 flag, and the right modifications in hostapd to use mgmt-tx and the flag. But I guess that's just another thing on the growing list of things to do to move hostapd to not use monitor interfaces ... > Hmm, not sure how much work that would be ... > > >> @@ -1257,7 +1265,7 @@ ieee80211_tx_prepare(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, > >> tx->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_UNICAST; > >> if (unlikely(local->wifi_wme_noack_test)) > >> info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK; > >> - else > >> + else if (!(info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK)) > >> info->flags &= ~IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK; > > > > ?? > > Don't remove the IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK flag when it was set via radiotap. Well, ok, but the logic is: if (flag not set) unset flag which is kinda useless, right? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
