On 08/24/2011 05:30 PM, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 07:55:34PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/core.h | 1 + >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/debug.c | 13 +++++++++++++ >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/debug.h | 9 +++++++++ >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/init.c | 6 ++++++ >> 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/Kconfig >> index 3d5f8be..ea9387b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/Kconfig >> @@ -13,3 +13,9 @@ config ATH6KL_DEBUG >> depends on ATH6KL >> ---help--- >> Enables debug support >> +config ATH6KL_DEBUGFS >> + bool "ath6kl debugfs" >> + depends on ATH6KL_DEBUG && DEBUG_FS > > ATH6KL_DEBUGFS can be independent of ATH6KL_DEBUG. I'll send v2 > fixing this. Actually do we really need ATH6KL_DEBUGFS? I would think that if both ATH6KL_DEBUG and DEBUG_FS are enabled we should just enable debugfs code in ath6kl. I don't see the need to have separate kconfig option control that. But, as usual, I could be just too blind to see the need :) Kalle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
