On 2011-05-06 2:16 AM, Ben Greear wrote: > On 05/05/2011 02:54 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2011-05-05 11:43 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>> On 05/05/2011 02:15 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>>> On 05/05/2011 02:03 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >>>>> On 2011-05-05 10:44 PM, Ben Greear wrote: >>>>>> I bisected the problem I was having with ath9k STA configured for WPA >>>>>> not being able to authenticate. I'm using nohwcrypt=1, which may >>>>>> be why no one else sees it. >>>> >>>>>> I'll be happy to test patches, it seems very easy to reproduce on >>>>>> my setup. >>>>> How about this? >>>>> >>>>> --- a/net/mac80211/tx.c >>>>> +++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c >>>>> @@ -1270,6 +1270,9 @@ ieee80211_tx_prepare(struct ieee80211_su >>>>> info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_CTL_CLEAR_PS_FILT; >>>>> else if (test_and_clear_sta_flags(tx->sta, WLAN_STA_CLEAR_PS_FILT)) >>>>> info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_CTL_CLEAR_PS_FILT; >>>>> + else if (sdata->vif.type != NL80211_IFTYPE_AP&& >>>>> + sdata->vif.type != NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN) >>>>> + info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_CTL_CLEAR_PS_FILT; >>>>> >>>>> hdrlen = ieee80211_hdrlen(hdr->frame_control); >>>>> if (skb->len> hdrlen + sizeof(rfc1042_header) + 2) { >>>> >>>> Yes, that seems to fix the problem. >>>> >>>> Thanks for the quick fix! >>> >>> Well, that appeared to fix the problem on -rc1, but when I go >>> back to -rc6 and apply that patch, it still doesn't work. >>> >>> Might be some other issue though... >> Odd. Please try bisecting by applying the patch for each test and >> reverting it before running git bisect again. > > Unless I made a mistake, it's this patch that causes the next problem: > > [greearb@build-32 linux.wt]$ git bisect bad > 93ae2dd2230393566738a5f211ffbaa33b056d56 is the first bad commit > commit 93ae2dd2230393566738a5f211ffbaa33b056d56 > Author: Felix Fietkau<nbd@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sun Apr 17 23:28:10 2011 +0200 > > ath9k: assign keycache slots to unencrypted stations > > Makes me wonder if I'm the only one crazy enough to actually use > wireless testing :P I use compat-wireless based on wireless-testing all the time, but in my tests, I did not encounter the issues that you're reporting, no idea why. This should fix the second issue: --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c @@ -1722,6 +1722,10 @@ static int ath9k_sta_add(struct ieee8021 struct ath_node *an = (struct ath_node *) sta->drv_priv; struct ieee80211_key_conf ps_key = { }; + if (vif->opmode != NL80211_IFTYPE_AP && + vif->opmode != NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN) + return 0; + ath_node_attach(sc, sta); an->ps_key = ath_key_config(common, vif, sta, &ps_key); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html