On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 22:06, Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:11 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:49 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 13:24, Johannes Berg >> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > It'd be nicer if you could separate out mac80211 patches, but then >> Luca >> > > needs to hold off merging until John picked up the mac80211 patch. >> > >> > Yea that would complicate matters a bit. Does the ordering of the >> > patches bother you? >> >> It just makes it more complicated for me to pick out the right thing >> -- >> I almost missed that there was a mac80211 patch in this huge series. > > Yes, I totally agree with Johannes. I prefer that > mac80211/cfg80211/whatever_other_stuff be sent as separate series, so > that there's not confusions about who applies what. If the patches are > in the same series, I always need to ask John to either take them all or > not. > > The ideal is if you send mac80211 patches separated from wl12xx and > mention the dependency on the wl12xx series, so I'm aware and wait for > John's integration before taking the wl12xx stuff in. Sure thing. I'll separate the patches. Arik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
