On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:11 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:49 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 13:24, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It'd be nicer if you could separate out mac80211 patches, but then > Luca > > > needs to hold off merging until John picked up the mac80211 patch. > > > > Yea that would complicate matters a bit. Does the ordering of the > > patches bother you? > > It just makes it more complicated for me to pick out the right thing > -- > I almost missed that there was a mac80211 patch in this huge series. Yes, I totally agree with Johannes. I prefer that mac80211/cfg80211/whatever_other_stuff be sent as separate series, so that there's not confusions about who applies what. If the patches are in the same series, I always need to ask John to either take them all or not. The ideal is if you send mac80211 patches separated from wl12xx and mention the dependency on the wl12xx series, so I'm aware and wait for John's integration before taking the wl12xx stuff in. -- Cheers, Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
