Search Linux Wireless

Re: [RFC 3/8] cfg80211: pass DFS region to drivers through reg_notifier()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
<lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <lrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Johannes Berg
>> <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 19:23 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>>> Â Â Â /* Lets us get back the wiphy on the callback */
>>>> Â Â Â int (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
>>>> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â struct regulatory_request *request);
>>>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â struct regulatory_request *request,
>>>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â u8 dfs_region);
>>>
>>> So does that mean we need to implement a reg_notifier if we want to have
>>> radar detection? Doesn't an empty reg_notifier already alter behaviour
>>
>> An empty reg_notifier() should not do anything. Its either through the
>> reg_notifier() or we add a new callback specifically for DFS. A new
>> callback may give more flexibility later if we want to pass up more
>> data.
>
> After some more thought I think its best to keep this within the
> reg_notifier() instead of adding a new callback, the reason being that
> we are already passing some regulatory data on it, no point in
> splitting up the calls and having those synch up on themselves later
> on the driver. But we are missing the alpha2 which I suspect drivers
> may need to request_firmware() some DFS data for the specific chipset,
> or do their own lookup on local static data. We don't currently pass
> the cfg80211_regdomain but I think it makes sense in this case, then
> the user can just check the alpha2 from it and in case other users
> need any other data from the regulatory domain they can have at it.
>
> I'm going to make this change and submit as PATCH form next. I haven't
> seen any more feeback on this so I take it that we're OK with this.

Actually, the alpha2 is already part of the struct regulatory_request
which is passed and come to think of it I can just peg the dfs_region
onto this so we do not have to extend the callbacks anywhere.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux