On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 19:23 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> Â Â Â /* Lets us get back the wiphy on the callback */ >> Â Â Â int (*reg_notifier)(struct wiphy *wiphy, >> - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â struct regulatory_request *request); >> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â struct regulatory_request *request, >> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â u8 dfs_region); > > So does that mean we need to implement a reg_notifier if we want to have > radar detection? Doesn't an empty reg_notifier already alter behaviour An empty reg_notifier() should not do anything. Its either through the reg_notifier() or we add a new callback specifically for DFS. A new callback may give more flexibility later if we want to pass up more data. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
