On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:07:22AM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Helmut Schaa
> >> <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Am Donnerstag 04 November 2010 schrieb Ivo van Doorn:
> >> >> From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>
> >> >> At least some devices need such a long time to inititalize WPDMA. This
> >> >> only increases the maximum wait time and shouldn't affect devices that
> >> >> have been working before.
> >> >>
> >> >> Reported-by: Joshua Smith <jesmith@xxxxxxxx>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> ---
> >> >
> >> > Ivo, the patch context looks different then in the version I've send to you.
> >> >
> >> > The
> >> > for (i = 0; i < REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT; i++) {
> >> > should be
> >> > for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> >> >
> >> > Otherwise we don't wait up to one second as in the comment but just 50ms :P
> >> >
> >> > However, that change was part of a previous patch that was already merged into
> >> > the rt2x00 git tree. Seems like that change got lost during the merge ...
> >>
> >> I'll try to find the patch which changed the REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT behavior.
> >
> > I'm not sure but I guess I haven't sent that one as separate [PATCH] but it
> > was inlined in the mail traffic with Joshua ("Question about starting up an
> > AP").
>
> Ah ok, that explains why I missed it. I'll dig it up, and send it to
> wireless-testing
> as soon as possible (John, do you want it as separate patch, or should
> it be merged
> into this patch?).
Separate patch, please (if you haven't already sent it).
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
