Am Freitag 05 November 2010 schrieb Ivo Van Doorn:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Helmut Schaa
> <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Donnerstag 04 November 2010 schrieb Ivo van Doorn:
> >> From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> At least some devices need such a long time to inititalize WPDMA. This
> >> only increases the maximum wait time and shouldn't affect devices that
> >> have been working before.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Joshua Smith <jesmith@xxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >
> > Ivo, the patch context looks different then in the version I've send to you.
> >
> > The
> > for (i = 0; i < REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT; i++) {
> > should be
> > for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> >
> > Otherwise we don't wait up to one second as in the comment but just 50ms :P
> >
> > However, that change was part of a previous patch that was already merged into
> > the rt2x00 git tree. Seems like that change got lost during the merge ...
>
> I'll try to find the patch which changed the REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT behavior.
I'm not sure but I guess I haven't sent that one as separate [PATCH] but it
was inlined in the mail traffic with Joshua ("Question about starting up an
AP").
> I'm almost worried that more patches have somehow gotten lost (I already noticed
> that there were a bunch of patches which were send upstream had disappeared
> from rt2x00.git, but those fortunately reappeared during the last
> update from wireless-testing).
I haven't noticed any other missing patches till now.
> Ivo
>
> Ivo
So, you finally decided to clone yourself?
Thanks,
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
