Am Freitag 05 November 2010 schrieb Ivo Van Doorn: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Helmut Schaa > <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am Donnerstag 04 November 2010 schrieb Ivo van Doorn: > >> From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> At least some devices need such a long time to inititalize WPDMA. This > >> only increases the maximum wait time and shouldn't affect devices that > >> have been working before. > >> > >> Reported-by: Joshua Smith <jesmith@xxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > > > > Ivo, the patch context looks different then in the version I've send to you. > > > > The > > for (i = 0; i < REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT; i++) { > > should be > > for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) { > > > > Otherwise we don't wait up to one second as in the comment but just 50ms :P > > > > However, that change was part of a previous patch that was already merged into > > the rt2x00 git tree. Seems like that change got lost during the merge ... > > I'll try to find the patch which changed the REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT behavior. I'm not sure but I guess I haven't sent that one as separate [PATCH] but it was inlined in the mail traffic with Joshua ("Question about starting up an AP"). > I'm almost worried that more patches have somehow gotten lost (I already noticed > that there were a bunch of patches which were send upstream had disappeared > from rt2x00.git, but those fortunately reappeared during the last > update from wireless-testing). I haven't noticed any other missing patches till now. > Ivo > > Ivo So, you finally decided to clone yourself? Thanks, Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html