Hi,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Helmut Schaa
<helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag 04 November 2010 schrieb Ivo van Doorn:
>> From: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> At least some devices need such a long time to inititalize WPDMA. This
>> only increases the maximum wait time and shouldn't affect devices that
>> have been working before.
>>
>> Reported-by: Joshua Smith <jesmith@xxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> Ivo, the patch context looks different then in the version I've send to you.
>
> The
> for (i = 0; i < REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT; i++) {
> should be
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
>
> Otherwise we don't wait up to one second as in the comment but just 50ms :P
>
> However, that change was part of a previous patch that was already merged into
> the rt2x00 git tree. Seems like that change got lost during the merge ...
I'll try to find the patch which changed the REGISTER_BUSY_COUNT behavior.
I'm almost worried that more patches have somehow gotten lost (I already noticed
that there were a bunch of patches which were send upstream had disappeared
from rt2x00.git, but those fortunately reappeared during the last
update from wireless-testing).
Ivo
Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
