On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:32 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > I wonder if "rate" is really the best interface for this. Since it's a > threshold event, does it matter? Maybe there should instead be events > for MCS changes and legacy rate changes so we can avoid all those > calculations? In fact, since you'd only care about changes across a threshold etc, not the absolute rate, you might be able to build the system without ever doing the expensive rate calculation from MCS. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
