Hi Stanislaw, On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 01:42 -0700, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:39:53PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > Almost anywhere in the code we avoid committing rxon while performing > > scan, and make rxon commit when scan complete. Some current patches do > > not follow that rule. We have that problem at least in > > iwlagn_confirue_filter(), iwl_update_chain_flags() and > > iwl_bg_bt_full_concurrency(). > > Any comments about iwl_update_chain_flags, iwl_bg_bt_full_concurrency ? > I would like to know how to deal with them, should we deffer commit_rxon > to scan complete, or cancel the scan. Or maybe this is no problem > at all, because in example committing rxon vs scan was problem of > older firmware? > iwl_update_chain_flags() is used when PSP mode change, iwl_bg_bt_full_concurrency() is used only for BT coex and in BT full concurrency mode. For both case, I do not see any reason we can not defer to scan complete. Thanks Wey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
