On 09/27/2010 08:02 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 08:59:25AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
On 09/25/2010 06:43 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:14:30PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
You will be better-off pulling wireless-next-2.6 (and maybe
wireless-2.6 as well). The history there isn't always immutable
(although I prefer it to be), but it will tend to be a lot cleaner
than wireless-testing.
Any chance you could push tags in wireless-next-2.6?
Not sure what you mean -- are you not seeing the master-<date> tags?
It didn't seem like the 2.6.36-rcX tags were there..but then again, maybe
I'm looking for something that doesn't exist?
Ah...well, they probably won't be in there until after 2.6.36 is
released. I generally don't pull from Linus into that tree during
the release cycle in order to avoid surprising Dave when he pulls it.
But if you are basing on linux-2.6 then you should already have those
tags anyway?
I was going to run some diffs in wt against 2.6.36-rc5 to try to figure out
the changes I needed to pull in.
A straight pull of wt into 2.6.36-rc5 didn't work well for me, and it
appeared a rebase was going to be even worse.
So, I'm going to try manually applying patches...after I make another
stab at getting the ath5k virtual AP/STA patch acceptable.
Thanks,
Ben
John
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
