Search Linux Wireless

Re: rebased version of wireless-testing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:35:34PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> Is there a rebased version of wireless-testing, or is there a way to
> tell git to not apply any patch that was later reverted when pulling?
> 
> I'd like to pull wireless-testing changes into a tree based on linux-2.6,
> but I want it clean enough to easily see what changes I actually
> pulled in.
> 
> If not, I can manually pull in some patches as needed.

Don't do that -- wireless-testing is and likely always will be a mess.
It really only exists as a "-next lite" for those that only want
bleeding-edge wireless while keeping-up with linux-2.6 release
candidates.

You will be better-off pulling wireless-next-2.6 (and maybe
wireless-2.6 as well).  The history there isn't always immutable
(although I prefer it to be), but it will tend to be a lot cleaner
than wireless-testing.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx			might be all we have.  Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux