On 09/25/2010 06:43 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:14:30PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
You will be better-off pulling wireless-next-2.6 (and maybe
wireless-2.6 as well). The history there isn't always immutable
(although I prefer it to be), but it will tend to be a lot cleaner
than wireless-testing.
Any chance you could push tags in wireless-next-2.6?
Not sure what you mean -- are you not seeing the master-<date> tags?
It didn't seem like the 2.6.36-rcX tags were there..but then again, maybe
I'm looking for something that doesn't exist?
Basically, my goal is to pull in most or all of the changes from wireless-testing
into a tree based on Linus's tree (2.6.36-rc5 currently). But, I need to keep
my tree clean enough to deal with rebasing and following Linus's tree because I have
a bunch of my own patches to add as well.
If nothing else, I'll manually pull the virtual-wifi patches that I need out of wireless-testing
and apply them to my tree.
Thanks,
Ben
John
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
