On 09/21/2010 10:49 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
- snprintf(mac, sizeof(mac), "%pM", sta->sta.addr);
+ snprintf(mac, sizeof(mac), "%pM-%s",
+ sta->sta.addr, sta->sdata->name);
/*
* This might fail due to a race condition:
I got to thinking: Is there any reason to put the sta.addr in there?
Maybe just use sta->sdata->name? Seems it might be easier for
scripts to deal with?
APs have many STAs
So, when in STA mode, sta_info are related to local VIFs, but
in AP mode, they represent the remote wireless devices, with sdata pointing
to the local AP interface?
No, there's a sta_info for each peer, which in STA mode is only the AP.
maybe the stations should be moved from phy0/stations/ to
phy0/wlan0/stations/ instead?
That would be fine with me.
Thanks,
Ben
johannes
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
