On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 09:25 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > > - snprintf(mac, sizeof(mac), "%pM", sta->sta.addr); > > + snprintf(mac, sizeof(mac), "%pM-%s", > > + sta->sta.addr, sta->sdata->name); > > > > /* > > * This might fail due to a race condition: > > I got to thinking: Is there any reason to put the sta.addr in there? > > Maybe just use sta->sdata->name? Seems it might be easier for > scripts to deal with? APs have many STAs johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html