On 09/21/2010 05:15 AM, greearb@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Ben Greear<greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MAC address of AP isn't unique..need to add the device
name as well.
Signed-off-by: Ben Greear<greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
:100644 100644 76839d4... e802fce... M net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
index 76839d4..e802fce 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/debugfs_sta.c
@@ -301,14 +301,15 @@ STA_OPS(ht_capa);
void ieee80211_sta_debugfs_add(struct sta_info *sta)
{
struct dentry *stations_dir = sta->local->debugfs.stations;
- u8 mac[3*ETH_ALEN];
+ u8 mac[3*ETH_ALEN + IFNAMSIZ + 2];
sta->debugfs.add_has_run = true;
if (!stations_dir)
return;
- snprintf(mac, sizeof(mac), "%pM", sta->sta.addr);
+ snprintf(mac, sizeof(mac), "%pM-%s",
+ sta->sta.addr, sta->sdata->name);
/*
* This might fail due to a race condition:
I got to thinking: Is there any reason to put the sta.addr in there?
Maybe just use sta->sdata->name? Seems it might be easier for
scripts to deal with?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
