On Thursday 08 April 2010, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
> Add RT3071 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest
> Ralink rt3070 vendor driver.
>
> With this patch my RT3071 based devices start showing a sign of life.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> index 52e2422..209fd85 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
> @@ -1036,7 +1036,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt2800_link_stats);
> static u8 rt2800_get_default_vgc(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> {
> if (rt2x00dev->curr_band == IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ) {
> - if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070))
> + if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070) ||
> + rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3071))
> return 0x1c + (2 * rt2x00dev->lna_gain);
> else
> return 0x2e + rt2x00dev->lna_gain;
> @@ -1085,6 +1086,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt2800_link_tuner);
> int rt2800_init_registers(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> {
> u32 reg, reg2;
> + u16 eeprom;
> unsigned int i;
>
> rt2800_register_read(rt2x00dev, WPDMA_GLO_CFG, ®);
> @@ -1202,7 +1204,20 @@ int rt2800_init_registers(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> rt2x00_set_field32(®, BKOFF_SLOT_CFG_CC_DELAY_TIME, 2);
> rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, BKOFF_SLOT_CFG, reg);
>
> - if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070)) {
> + if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3071)) {
> + rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000400);
> + rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x00000000);
> + if (rt2x00_rev(rt2x00dev) < 0x0211) {
> + rt2x00_eeprom_read(rt2x00dev, EEPROM_NIC, &eeprom);
> + if (rt2x00_get_field16(eeprom, EEPROM_NIC_DAC_TEST))
> + reg = 0x0000002c;
> + else
> + reg = 0x0000000f;
> + } else {
> + reg = 0x00000000;
> + }
Is these some meaning to this fields, which makes it easier to use set_field32
with some definition to indicate how the field is named to understand what
the value means?
> - if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070)) {
> + if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3071)) {
> + rt2800_rfcsr_read(rt2x00dev, 1, &rfcsr);
> + rfcsr &= ~0x0c;
> + rfcsr |= 0x31;
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 1, rfcsr);
> +
> + rt2800_rfcsr_read(rt2x00dev, 15, &rfcsr);
> + rfcsr &= ~0x08;
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 15, rfcsr);
> +
> + rt2800_rfcsr_read(rt2x00dev, 20, &rfcsr);
> + rfcsr &= ~0x08;
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 20, rfcsr);
> +
> + rt2800_rfcsr_read(rt2x00dev, 21, &rfcsr);
> + rfcsr &= ~0x08;
> + rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 21, rfcsr);
> + }
Perhaps this needs some rt2x00_set_field8() magic as well. Not sure though
Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
