Re: [PATCH 6/9] rt2x00: Finish rt3070 support in rt2800 register initialization.

[Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thursday 08 April 2010, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote:
> rt2x00 had preliminary support for RT3070 based devices, but the support was
> incomplete.
> Update the RT3070 register initialization to be similar to the latest Ralink
> vendor driver.
> 
> With this patch my rt3070 based devices start showing a sign of life.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@xxxxxxxxx>


> @@ -1086,7 +1084,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt2800_link_tuner);
>   */
>  int rt2800_init_registers(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
>  {
> -	u32 reg;
> +	u32 reg, reg2;
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
>  	rt2800_register_read(rt2x00dev, WPDMA_GLO_CFG, &reg);
> @@ -1204,11 +1202,18 @@ int rt2800_init_registers(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
>  	rt2x00_set_field32(&reg, BKOFF_SLOT_CFG_CC_DELAY_TIME, 2);
>  	rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, BKOFF_SLOT_CFG, reg);
>  
> -	if (rt2x00_is_usb(rt2x00dev) &&
> -	    rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070) && rt2x00_rev(rt2x00dev) == 0x0200) {
> +	if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070)) {
>  		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x00000400);
> -		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x00000000);
> -		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, 0x00000000);
> +
> +		if (rt2x00_rev(rt2x00dev) < 0x0201) {
> +			reg = 0x00000000;
> +			reg2 = 0x0000002c;
> +		} else {
> +			reg = 0x00080606;
> +			reg2 = 0x00000000;
> +		}
> +		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, reg);
> +		rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG2, reg2);

Might as well put the rt2800_register_write call into the if, rather then storing
it into variables first. That way it is consistent with the rest of the code.
 
> @@ -1751,6 +1739,28 @@ int rt2800_init_rfcsr(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
>  	rt2x00_set_field8(&bbp, BBP4_BANDWIDTH, 0);
>  	rt2800_bbp_write(rt2x00dev, 4, bbp);
>  
> +	if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070) && rt2x00_rev(rt2x00dev) < 0x0201)
> +		rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 27, 0x03);
> +
> +	rt2800_register_read(rt2x00dev, OPT_14_CSR, &reg);
> +	rt2x00_set_field32(&reg, OPT_14_CSR_BIT0, 1);
> +	rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, OPT_14_CSR, reg);
> +
> +	rt2800_rfcsr_read(rt2x00dev, 17, &rfcsr);
> +	rt2x00_set_field8(&rfcsr, RFCSR17_R2, 0);
> +	rt2x00_eeprom_read(rt2x00dev, EEPROM_RSSI_BG2, &eeprom);
> +	if ((eeprom & 0x07) >= 1)

Might be nicer to do the access using rt2x00_get_field16,
plus some name for this magical field in the header file.

> +		rt2x00_set_field8(&rfcsr, RFCSR17_R1, eeprom & 0x07);
> +	rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 17, rfcsr);
> +
> +	if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070)) {
> +		rt2800_rfcsr_read(rt2x00dev, 27, &rfcsr);
> +		rfcsr &= 0x77;
> +		if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT3070) && rt2x00_rev(rt2x00dev) < 0x0201)
> +			rfcsr |= 0x03;
> +		rt2800_rfcsr_write(rt2x00dev, 27, rfcsr);
> +	}

Any ideas what these fields mean? Could set_field8 and _get_field8 simplify the code?

Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html