On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:58:57PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:51:44AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:21:56PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > >
> > > I can cherry-pick things if anyone pin-points something and run
> > > lont-time tests again. Any pointer appreciated.
> >
> > Oh, how about running 'git bisect' to try to find the solution? Just
> > remember to reverse 'good' and 'bad' for when you tell git bisect what
> > the results are.
>
> Jep, I thought about that of course. But unfortunately, the platform
> got merged mainline in the middle of that time window which makes
> bisecting tricky. And worse than that - every test run take around half
> a day at least :(
What you can do is backport the platform-support on top of rev initially
marked good (in a branch named say foo) and when asked for testing do:
git merge --no-commit foo
<test>
git reset --hard
git bisect {good|bad}
Assuming the platform-support got in in one go (and you shouldn't test
in the middle, which you can simply skip), the merge should always work
just fine.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
