On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 10:34 -0800, Adam Wozniak wrote: > Johannes Berg wrote: > > Or you can probably call rate_exit and rate_init but I don't know how > > the algorithms would react if you actually ask it for a rate during that > > race window? > > > There is no rate_exit in rate_control_ops, only init and update. There > is an rc80211_minstrel_exit() in rc80211_minstrel.c, but that just > unregisters the module, which I don't think is what you want. Hah, indeed, I thought it was symmetric, guess it's not. However, that reminds me that I actually wanted to get rid of rate_init() since it's mostly not useful to have it separate from alloc_sta()... oh well. I suppose if we document clearly that rate_init maybe called multiple times and audit the existing algorithms the patch could be ok. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
