On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:17 -0800, Adam Wozniak wrote: > I do not believe 1/2 was a hack. It really was possible to get to the > end of that function and use that variable without it being assigned the > correct value. Also, it is important to reinitialize the rate control > layer when the list of usable rates changes. Ah, indeed. But I still don't think the rate control _init() function should be called again. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
