Search Linux Wireless

[PATCH v2] wext: remove seq_start/stop sparse annotations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Even though they are true, they cause sparse to complain
because it doesn't see the __acquires(dev_base_lock) on
dev_seq_start() because it is only added to the function
in net/core/dev.c, not the header file. To keep track of
the nesting correctly we should probably annotate those
functions publically, but for now let's just remove the
annotation I added to wext.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Umm, now with subject.

 net/wireless/wext.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

--- wireless-testing.orig/net/wireless/wext.c	2009-05-12 08:12:23.000000000 +0200
+++ wireless-testing/net/wireless/wext.c	2009-05-12 08:13:16.000000000 +0200
@@ -650,14 +650,12 @@ static int wireless_seq_show(struct seq_
 }
 
 static void *wireless_dev_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
-	__acquires(dev_base_lock)
 {
 	rtnl_lock();
 	return dev_seq_start(seq, pos);
 }
 
 static void wireless_dev_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
-	__releases(dev_base_lock)
 {
 	dev_seq_stop(seq, v);
 	rtnl_unlock();


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux