On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 01:00 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > Right. If a particular chipset doesn't properly supported PS then we >> > shouldn't actually support it at all -- but we cannot know if the AP is >> > broken. >> >> How about leaving it to the supplicant to guess if the AP is borked or not. >> >> Kalle, what would happen with these broken APs? > > We talked about that briefly yesterday -- it's not very easy to > determine this because of the various ways things break: > > * one AP sets the broadcast/multicast bit one beacon too late (after > having already sent the frames) > * one AP doesn't buffer frames at all > * one AP doesn't respond to PS-poll frames It sounds like all 3 things can be tested for. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
