On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 11:31 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > Yeah, sounds OK. Just to be clear, problems with this code will appear > on a *per-AP* basis, not a per-card basis, right? ie there are some > stupid APs that won't work with it, but it won't be the case that a > chipset will be broken for all APs, right? Right. If a particular chipset doesn't properly supported PS then we shouldn't actually support it at all -- but we cannot know if the AP is broken. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
