On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:57:23PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 16:40 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > I don't know why you insist on having a wrapper for > > > wiphy->wiphy_idx but it's ok :) > > > > Heh its just because wiphy->wiphy_idx does not exist, the drv has so > > you must go to the container and then use that. If we move the idx to > > the wiphy then I'm good to use wiphy->wiphy_idx. Want to do that? > > Ah. Not sure, but I don't think we need to expose that to drivers. Unless we may need it later for virtual wiphys, not sure, Jouni? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
