On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 16:40 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > I don't know why you insist on having a wrapper for > > wiphy->wiphy_idx but it's ok :) > > Heh its just because wiphy->wiphy_idx does not exist, the drv has so > you must go to the container and then use that. If we move the idx to > the wiphy then I'm good to use wiphy->wiphy_idx. Want to do that? Ah. Not sure, but I don't think we need to expose that to drivers. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
