> From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2024 3:30 PM > To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@xxxxxxxxxx>; Calvin Owens > <calvin@xxxxxxxxxx>; Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kalle Valo > <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [EXT] [RFC PATCH 0/4] mwifiex: add support for iw61x > > Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or > opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report > this email' button > > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 06:39:15AM +0000, David Lin wrote: > > > > > > Not only this code segment. In fact, you did not add VDLL data > > > > > > patch support > > > > > to sdio.c. > > > > > > If you try to add the code and do test, you will know what is > > > > > > missing in your > > > > > code. > > > > > > > > > > Could you point me to the code you mean? > > > > > > > > > > Sascha > > > > > > > > > > > > > I only know the porting VDLL code in nxpwifi. > > > > > > Yes, and I asked for a pointer to that code, some function name, or > > > file/line or whatever, because I looked at the nxpwifi driver and > > > don't know what you mean with "VDLL data patch support" in sdio.c. > > > > > > Sascha > > > > > > > It is better for you to check MXM driver. It is the same as Mwifiex which > support all SDIO modes. > > Now I am confused. You said: > > > In fact, you did not add VDLL data patch support to sdio.c > > I was under the assumption that the nxpwifi driver that you specifically posted > for the iw61x chipset should contain this code. Isn't that the case? > > BTW did you really mean "VDLL data patch" or did you mean "VDLL data > path"? > Sorry VDLL data path. You did not add the code to support this new SDIO data type in your patch. Please check MXM driver which supports all SDIO modes. David
