On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 01:51:46AM +0000, David Lin wrote:
> > From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, September 2, 2024 9:11 PM
> > To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@xxxxxxxxxx>; Calvin Owens
> > <calvin@xxxxxxxxxx>; Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kalle Valo
> > <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [EXT] [RFC PATCH 0/4] mwifiex: add support for iw61x
> >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sascha
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sascha Hauer (4):
> > > > > > > > wifi: mwifiex: release firmware at remove time
> > > > > > > > wifi: mwifiex: handle VDLL
> > > > > > > > wifi: mwifiex: wait longer for SDIO card status
> > > > > > > > mwifiex: add iw61x support
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cmdevt.c | 86
> > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h | 16 ++++
> > > > > > > > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.c | 9 +-
> > > > > > > > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h | 4 +
> > > > > > > > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c | 81
> > > > ++++++++++++++++-
> > > > > > > > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.h | 3 +
> > > > > > > > .../net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c | 4
> > > > > > > > + .../net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/uap_event.c | 4 +
> > > > > > > > include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h | 3 +
> > > > > > > > 9 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > The VDLL support in the downstream driver supports a case when a
> > > > VDLL event comes in while a command is being sent. I catched this
> > > > with this
> > > > test:
> > > >
> > > > if (adapter->cmd_sent) {
> > > > mwifiex_dbg(adapter, MSG, "%s: adapter is busy\n",
> > > > __func__);
> > > > return -EBUSY;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > The downstream driver defers handling of the VDLL event to the main
> > > > process in this case. I haven't implemented this case in my patch
> > > > because I wasn't able to trigger it, but is this the case you are referring to?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not only this code segment. In fact, you did not add VDLL data patch support
> > to sdio.c.
> > > If you try to add the code and do test, you will know what is missing in your
> > code.
> >
> > Could you point me to the code you mean?
> >
> > Sascha
> >
>
> I only know the porting VDLL code in nxpwifi.
Yes, and I asked for a pointer to that code, some function name, or
file/line or whatever, because I looked at the nxpwifi driver and don't
know what you mean with "VDLL data patch support" in sdio.c.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
