On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 13:04 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > > > > > Use the sum of the number of interfaces from each radio instead of the > > > maximum. > > > > Oh, then legacy user have misconception of the global interfaces > > advertised and try to fail for the allowed limits. > > Sure, but that might be an issue either way until user space is updated > and users start looking at the per-radio ifcomb data. I'm kind of with Karthikeyan here - this could be understood as a regression, since you're now telling userspace something you can't actually do. > The global data is simply not enough to describe the details of the > radio split. Obviously, but that doesn't mean the global data as advertised in the existing attributes must be *wrong*. It could be a subset, and the superset data is only available to new implementations. johannes
